[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19416272.eCNUZ3hTWV@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:36:30 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] rtc: pcf8563: fix uninitialized use warning
gcc-4.9 found a potential condition under which the 'pending'
variable may be used uninitialized:
drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c: In function 'pcf8563_irq':
drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c:173:5: warning: 'pending' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
This is because in the pcf8563_get_alarm_mode() function, we
check any nonzero return of pcf8563_read_block_data, but
in the irq function we only check for negative values, so
a possible positive value does not get detected if the compiler
chooses not to inline the entire call chain.
Checking for any non-zero value in the interrupt handler as well
is just as correct and lets the compiler know what we are doing,
without needing a bogus initialization.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
index 5a197d9dc7e7..3a6f994c4da8 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pcf8563_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
char pending;
err = pcf8563_get_alarm_mode(pcf8563->client, NULL, &pending);
- if (err < 0)
+ if (err)
return err;
if (pending) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists