[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:42:25 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kishon <kishon@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for
exynos5420/5800
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:19:50AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> >> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
> >> >> > for that ? It looks like you could just as well do this from
> >> >> > phy_power_on() ?
> >> >>
> >> >> No, unfortunately keeping these calibration settings in phy_power_on()
> >> >> doesn't help, since we need to do this after XHCI reset has happened.
> >> >
> >> > teach xHCI about PHYs ?
> >>
> >> sorry i couldn't understand you here.
> >> Aren't we trying to do the same with Heikki's patch about dwc3 :
> >> [PATCH 6/6] usb: dwc3: host: convey the PHYs to xhci
> >>
> >> and the 2nd patch in this series :
> >> [PATCH v6 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Get PHYs for xhci's hcds
> >>
> >> Is there something else that is expected ?
> >
> > right, use that to call phy_init() at the right time, then you need to
> > add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely, will only be used by you
> > ;-)
>
> so you mean, the xhci should itself call phy_init() at a time suitable,
> so that ->calibrate() is not required at all ?
>
> i think you meant there - "then you __do not__ need to
right :-)
> > add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely,
> will only be used by you", is it ?
yup
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists