linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 00/13] perf/core improvements and fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:59:54 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/13] perf/core improvements and fixes

Em Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:54:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
 
> > Em Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:48:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > > It looks like I reposted older versions by mistake on 31 July.
> > > Very sorry :-(

> > > The originals were changed as described here:

> > > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140621020918615
> > > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140618721010170

> > No problem, the good thing is that we're almost getting it all 
> > in. I'll rework the branch and resubmit, Ingo, is that OK with 
> > you? [...]

> Yeah, that's perfectly OK.

> > [...] Or have you already pulled and we should instead send a 
> > patch on top, fixing the problem?

> I pulled it locally then unpulled as it didn't pass my (very 
> simple) tests and it looked like there's something fishy going 
> on.

Yeah, I should've tested this more, will make sure I test these things
this time.

Having a requirement that for each new feature we need an entry in 'perf
test' and/or in make -C tools/perf build-test seems a bit harsh, but
would be ideal, hook that to 'git request-pull' and this would hopefully
only happen every celestial aligment nights or so :-\
 
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/