[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:55:03 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] block: introduce blk_flush_queue to drive flush machinery
On 09/09/2014 12:43 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:05:46PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> This patch introduces 'struct blk_flush_queue' and puts all
>> flush machinery related stuff into this strcuture, so that
>
> s/stuff/fields/
> s/strcuture/structure/
>
> Looks good, but a few more nitpicks below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
>> +int blk_init_flush(struct request_queue *q)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct blk_flush_queue *fq = kzalloc(sizeof(*fq), GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> + if (!fq)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + q->fq = fq;
>
> I think it would be cleaner to return the flush data structure and
> assign it in the caller.
I was going to suggest renaming because of this as well. If we do this:
q->fq = blk_init_flush(q);
then it's immediately clear what it does, whereas blk_init_flush(q)
means very little on its own. I'd change the naming to
blk_alloc_flush_queue() and blk_free_flush_queue().
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists