linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix interrupt timeouts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140909200344.GB14765@obsidianresearch.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:03:44 -0600
From:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:	Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
Cc:	Scot Doyle <lkml14@...tdoyle.com>,
	Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...gle.com>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix interrupt timeouts

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:44:35PM +0200, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> Hi Scot,
> Am Montag, 25. August 2014, 09:14:03 schrieb Scot Doyle:
> > commit 4c663cfc523a88d97a8309b04a089c27dc57fd7e
> >     wait: fix false timeouts when using wait_event_timeout()
> > 
> > changed the semantics of wait_event_interruptible_timeout so that a
> > condition check is performed after timeout and 1 is returned if true.
> 
> is this one still valid or superseeded by one of the other patches?

It is not correct, so NAK on this patch.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/