[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1410310148-26260-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:49:07 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf, x86: Add INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Add a FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT macro that allows us to
match on event+umask, and in additional all flags.
This is needed to ensure the INV and CMASK fields
are zero for specific events, as this can cause undefined
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index fc5eb39..4e6cdb0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -253,6 +253,10 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
#define INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK)
+/* Like UEVENT_CONSTRAINT, but match flags too */
+#define INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
+ EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS)
+
#define INTEL_PLD_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
__EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK|X86_ALL_EVENT_FLAGS, \
HWEIGHT(n), 0, PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT)
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists