linux-kernel - Re:Re: [PATCH 02/12] clk: mmp: add spin lock for clk-frac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:30:47 +0800 (CST)
From:	"Chao Xie" <xiechao_mail@....com>
To:	"Mike Turquette" <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Chao Xie" <chao.xie@...vell.com>, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
	haojian.zhuang@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH 02/12] clk: mmp: add spin lock for clk-frac


At 2014-09-04 02:04:24, "Mike Turquette" <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
>Quoting Chao Xie (2014-08-25 21:38:14)
>> From: Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>
>> 
>> The register used by clk-frac may be shared with
>> other clocks.
>> So it needs to use spin lock to protect the register
>> access.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>
>
>This patch will break against the latest clk-next due to api changes.
>You can see more here[0] and use this script to update your code if you
>like[1].
>
>Basically the calls to clk_set_rate need to be changed to
>clk_provider_set_rate.

>
I see the patch set [0] is V10 now, and it is not merged to clk-next yet.
So should i wait for the patch set to be merged, then send out the updated patches?

>[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1409758148-20104-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
>[1] http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-refactoring-9&id=ea48c0d655346cce26329523cf24574f9ea8feee
>
>Regards,
>Mike