lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140910124615.GA466@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:46:15 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible

On Fri 2014-09-05 13:13:16, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:38:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > -	if (!mdesc)
> > > +	if (mdesc)
> > > +		machine_name = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name();
> > > +	else
> > >  		mdesc = setup_machine_tags(__atags_pointer,
> > > __machine_arch_type); machine_desc = mdesc;
> > > -	machine_name = mdesc->name;
> > > +	if (!machine_name)
> > > +		machine_name = mdesc->name;
> > > 
> > >  	if (mdesc->reboot_mode != REBOOT_HARD)
> > >  		reboot_mode = mdesc->reboot_mode;
> > 
> > So, do you really want to break userspace which reading file 
> > /proc/cpuinfo (after migration from boardcode --> DT)?
> > 
> > I still do not see reason for that. And only this one file is 
> > problematic...
> 
> Sorry, I just don't give a damn about your whinging about this.  I've
> made the situation perfectly clear.  Your patch will not be accepted.

Linus made it pretty clear that regressions are not accepted. 

You are an arm maintainer and there is regression in n900 that broke userspace.

How do you solve it?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ