[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <540FBB93.4020509@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:46:43 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 14/16] x86, irq: Introduce helper to check whether
an IOAPIC has been registered
On 2014/9/9 20:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>> Introduce acpi_ioapic_registered() to check whether an IOAPIC has already
>> been registered, it will be used when enabling IOAPIC hotplug.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h
>> index ce63cf34c93c..0db2b7037e4b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h
>> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ extern void mp_unmap_irq(int irq);
>> extern int mp_register_ioapic(int id, u32 address, u32 gsi_base,
>> struct ioapic_domain_cfg *cfg);
>> extern int mp_unregister_ioapic(u32 gsi_base);
>> +extern int mp_ioapic_registered(u32 gsi_base);
>> extern int mp_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
>> extern void mp_irqdomain_unmap(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> index 560a6d1cb0f4..6aa796f77b71 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
>> @@ -810,6 +810,17 @@ int acpi_unregister_ioapic(acpi_handle handle, u32 gsi_base)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_unregister_ioapic);
>>
>> +int acpi_ioapic_registered(acpi_handle handle, u32 gsi_base)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + down_write(&acpi_ioapic_rwsem);
>
> Why down_write? You are merily checking whether the thing is
> registered already.
Yeah, a down_read() should be enough:)
>> + ret = mp_ioapic_registered(gsi_base);
>> + up_write(&acpi_ioapic_rwsem);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> So I assume that this is for a particular caller in the apci ioapic
> hotplug code and that call site has its own serialization. Otherwise
> the return value is not protected at all.
>
> Please add a Docbook comment to that function, and document the
> locking rules as thats pretty non obvious.
How about this comments about locking rules?
/*
* Locks related to IOAPIC hotplug
* Hotplug side:
* ->lock_device_hotplug() //device_hotplug_lock
* ->acpi_ioapic_rwsem
* ->ioapic_lock
* Interrupt mapping side:
* ->acpi_ioapic_rwsem
* ->ioapic_mutex
* ->ioapic_lock
*/
Regards!
Gerry
>
> The such is missing in some other patches as well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists