[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <540FBC21.2090504@rock-chips.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:49:05 +0800
From: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
CC: rui.zhang@...el.com, edubezval@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
cf@...k-chips.com, dianders@...omium.org, dtor@...omium.org,
zyw@...k-chips.com, addy.ke@...k-chips.com,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: dts: add main Thermal info to rk3288
Hi Heiko,
在 2014年09月09日 19:37, Heiko Stübner 写道:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2014, 10:10:38 schrieb Caesar Wang:
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>> index 36be7bb..3d672e3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>> @@ -224,6 +224,17 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> + tsadc: tsadc@...80000 {
> please keep the list of nodes sorted by register address. So when looking at
> my v3.18-next/dts branch, it should be after uart4: serial@...c0000 and before
> usb_host0_ehci: usb@...00000 .
>
oh...,I will fix it.
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-tsadc";
>> + reg = <0xff280000 0x100>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&cru SCLK_TSADC>, <&cru PCLK_TSADC>;
>> + clock-names = "tsadc", "apb_pclk";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-1 = <&tsadc_int>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> /* NOTE: ohci@...20000 doesn't actually work on hardware */
>>
>> usb_hsic: usb@...c0000 {
>> @@ -611,5 +622,12 @@
>> rockchip,pins = <5 15 3 &pcfg_pull_none>;
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + tsadc {
>> + tsadc_int: tsadc-int {
>> + rockchip,pins = <0 10 RK_FUNC_1 &pcfg_pull_up>;
>> + };
>> + };
> After looking this up in the schematics I see that this is the
> overtemperature-protection output pin ... labeled OTP_OUT.
> So I'd think the pinconfig should reflect this pin-name, especially as tsadc-int
> suggests, that this would be an interrupt leading into the tsadc, while in
> fact it is an output to a separate circuit.
>
Maybe,I guess your mean as the follows .
Please correct it and Laugh out if I got it wrong.
tsadc {
otp_out: otp-out {
rockchip,pins = <0 10 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
};
tsadc_int: tsadc-int {
rockchip,pins = <0 10 RK_FUNC_1 &pcfg_pull_none>;
};
};
Then,I deal with the otp_out in thermal driver.
I believe The "otp_out" will restart board if it's a high active.
tsadc_int: tsadc-int {
+ rockchip,pins = <0 10 RK_FUNC_1 &pcfg_pull_up>;
+ };
But,I think the about will be implemented in thermal driver.
> Heiko
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Caesar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists