[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1409100921060.32538@gentwo.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:22:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/sl[aou]b: make kfree() aware of error pointers
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> We obviously don't, as such code will be causing explosions. This is meant
> as a prevention of problems such as the one that has just been fixed in
> ext4.
So we actually think that it is okay to pass an error pointer to kfree
and silently ignore that?
Are we thinking about just accepting any pointer in kfree and ignore
invalid ones?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists