[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140910153902.GE13342@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:39:02 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
jszhang@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] net: pxa168_eth: fix Ethernet flow control status
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:44:04PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> IEEE 802.3x Ethernet flow control is disabled when bit (1 << 2) is set
> in the port status register. Fix the flow control detection in the link
> event handling function which was relying on the opposite assumption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c
> index 953112f87c5f..10422f2df6cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
> /* Bit definitions for Port status */
> #define PORT_SPEED_100 (1 << 0)
> #define FULL_DUPLEX (1 << 1)
> -#define FLOW_CONTROL_ENABLED (1 << 2)
> +#define FLOW_CONTROL_DISABLED (1 << 2)
> #define LINK_UP (1 << 3)
>
> /* Bit definitions for work to be done */
> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static void handle_link_event(struct pxa168_eth_private *pep)
> speed = 10;
>
> duplex = (port_status & FULL_DUPLEX) ? 1 : 0;
> - fc = (port_status & FLOW_CONTROL_ENABLED) ? 1 : 0;
> + fc = (port_status & FLOW_CONTROL_DISABLED) ? 0 : 1;
> netdev_info(dev, "link up, %d Mb/s, %s duplex, flow control %sabled\n",
> speed, duplex ? "full" : "half", fc ? "en" : "dis");
> if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev))
Could this be a hardware bug which has been fixed in a newer version
of the IP? It would be good to have this tested on an old platform
using this driver.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists