[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140910165848.GA11901@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:58:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Fall back to vmalloc for BTS buffer allocation
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 06:35:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:40:12PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > We did this once, and that blew up big time.
> > >
> > > Even now, vmalloc_fault() has a very explicit:
> > >
> > > WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
> > >
> > > So this isn't going to happen until you fix that.
> >
> > Good point.
> >
> > We just need to call vmalloc_sync_all at allocation time,
> > no need to change vmalloc_fault.
>
> Somehow that wasn't considered adequate, but lemme try and dig out that
> thread. It should be somewhere...
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/14/465
Note that since then we have actually fixed the 'cannot fault from NMI
context' thing, so we should be able to actually take those faults. I
suspect we can simply remove those WARNs from the vmalloc fault path,
but it would need double checking to see if there's no other reasons.
Also:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/10/581
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3048111/
I'm not entirely sure what the final conclusion is, except to note that
it didn't happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists