[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140910170506.GL25219@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:05:06 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression caused by cgroups optimization in 3.17-rc2
On Wed 10-09-14 09:57:56, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 09/10/2014 09:29 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I do not have a bigger machine to play with unfortunately. I think the
> > patch makes sense on its own. I would really appreciate if you could
> > give it a try on your machine with !root memcg case to see how much it
> > helped. I would expect similar results to your previous testing without
> > the revert and Johannes' patch.
>
> So you want to see before/after this patch:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, memcg: Do not kill release batching in
> free_pages_and_swap_cache
>
> And you want it on top of a kernel with the revert or without?
Revert doesn't make any difference if you run the load inside a memcg
(without any limit set).
So just before and after the patch would be sufficient.
Thanks a lot Dave!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists