linux-kernel - [PATCH V5 13/16] perf, x86: re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <978921123-30240-4-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date:	Sun,  7 Jan 2001 21:32:00 -0500
From:	kan.liang@...el.com
To:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, eranian@...gle.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
	acme@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V5 13/16] perf, x86: re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>

make later patch more readable, no logic change.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 0a71f04..418e953 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -393,36 +393,35 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 
 		if (event->attr.precise_ip > precise)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-		/*
-		 * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
-		 * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
-		 */
-		if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 &&
-		    x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
-			u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
-
-			if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
-				if (!precise_br_compat(event))
-					return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-				/* branch_sample_type is compatible */
-
-			} else {
-				/*
-				 * user did not specify  branch_sample_type
-				 *
-				 * For PEBS fixups, we capture all
-				 * the branches at the priv level of the
-				 * event.
-				 */
-				*br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
-
-				if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
-					*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
-
-				if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
-					*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
-			}
+	}
+	/*
+	 * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
+	 * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
+	 */
+	if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
+		u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+		if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+			if (!precise_br_compat(event))
+				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+			/* branch_sample_type is compatible */
+
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * user did not specify  branch_sample_type
+			 *
+			 * For PEBS fixups, we capture all
+			 * the branches at the priv level of the
+			 * event.
+			 */
+			*br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
+
+			if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
+				*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
+
+			if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
+				*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/