linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] x86, pat: Update documentation for WT changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrUh20-2PX_KN2KWO085n=5XJpOnPysmCGbk7bufaD3Mhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:29:49 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] x86, pat: Update documentation for WT changes

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 11:30 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
>> > +Drivers may map the entire NV-DIMM range with ioremap_cache and then change
>> > +a specific range to wt with set_memory_wt.
>>
>> That's mighty specific :)
>
> How about below?
>
> Drivers may use set_memory_wt to set WT type for cached reserve ranges.

Do they have to be cached?

How about:

Drivers may call set_memory_wt on ioremapped ranges.  In this case,
there is no need to change the memory type back before calling
iounmap.

(Or only on cached ioremapped ranges if that is, in fact, the case.)

--Andy

>
>> It's also not all that informative.  Are you supposed to set the
>> memory back before iounmapping?
>
> Setting back to WB before iounmap is not required, but set_memory_wb is
> used when it wants to put it back to WB before unmapping.
>
>> Can you do this with set_memory_wc on
>> an uncached mapping?
>
> The table lists interfaces and their intended usage.  Using
> set_memory_wc on an uncached mapping probably works, but is not an
> intended use.
>
> Thanks,
> -Toshi
>



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/