linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86, mm, pat: Change reserve

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1410383484.28990.303.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:11:24 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86, mm, pat: Change reserve_memtype() to handle
 WT

On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:06 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 13:14 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> On 09/10/2014 12:30 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >> >
> >> > When WT is unavailable due to the PAT errata, it does not fail but gets
> >> > redirected to UC-.  Similarly, when PAT is disabled, WT gets redirected
> >> > to UC- as well.
> >> >
> >>
> >> But on pre-PAT hardware you can still do WT.
> >
> > Yes, if we manipulates the bits directly, but such code is no longer
> > allowed for PAT systems.  The PAT-based kernel interfaces won't work for
> > pre-PAT systems, and therefore requests are redirected to UC- on such
> > systems.
> >
> 
> Right, the PWT bit.  Forgot about that.
> 
> I wonder whether it would make sense to do some followup patches to
> replace the current support for non-PAT machines with a "PAT" and
> corresponding reverse map that exactly matches the mapping when PAT is
> disabled.  These patches are almost there.

That's possible, but the only benefit is that we can enable WT on
pre-PAT systems, which I do not think anyone cares now...  WB & UC work
on pre-PAT systems.  WC & WT need PAT.  I think this requirement is
reasonable.

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/