[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V4-dHpKwRqewCr7ujDdRYiMiUcRuJAS7C602EyCMnPFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:37:13 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
zhangqing <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>, xxx <xxx@...k-chips.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] RTC: RK808: add RTC driver for RK808
Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:18:04 +0800 Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>
>> Adding RTC driver for supporting RTC device present inside RK808 PMIC.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> + ret = rtc_valid_tm(&tm);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "invalid date/time and init time\n");
>> + rk808_rtc_set_time(&pdev->dev, &tm_def);
>> + }
>
> This is somewhat unusual. Most drivers will emit a warning and give up
> when they find the time is wrong. Why is this driver different and is
> this desirable behaviour?
When you say "give up", what does that mean? I assume the driver
should keep initting, right? Then the user can go in and set a time
later...
I did test things with just removing this chunk of code. You get some
yells at bootup if you put a bogus time in there:
[ 2.987590] rk808-rtc rk808-rtc: invalid date/time and init time
[ 3.013148] rk808-rtc rk808-rtc: rtc core: registered rk808-rtc as rtc0
[ 4.586115] rk808-rtc rk808-rtc: hctosys: invalid date/time
...but if you later set a valid time then everything is fine. That
seems reasonable behavior to me, so I guess we could just remove this
whole chunk? It appears that after a normal bootup the date/time is
something valid.
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists