[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24748175.vQ81Vho3N1@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:29:29 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 02:18:50 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c between commit aa0bdc303b0f
> ("ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove duplicate CPUFreq bits") from the
> arm-soc tree and commit 978027e170fb ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and
> internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") from the pm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the lines that were updated by the
> latter) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists