linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] blk-merge: fix blk_recount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVOX=Tcc9fN_C0FuEHsF22dave9vXtoVct5sx1iK1AWRXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:58:27 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kick In <pierre-andre.morey@...onical.com>,
	Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> writes:
>> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> writes:
>> Here's what I have.  It seems to work as expected, but I haven't
>> benchmarked it.
>
> Hi Ming,
>
>         Any chance you can run your benchmarks against this patch?

I can run the previous benchmark against this patch, but I am wondering
if it is enough since the change need lots of test cases to verify.

BTW, looks your patch doesn't against upstream kernel, since I can't
find alloc_indirect() in drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/