| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140911211802.GA18626@localhost> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 05:18:02 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> Cc: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>, Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [nohz] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1430 warn_pre_alternatives() Hi Frederic, On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:53:19PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:17:04PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git nohz/fixes-v2 > > > > commit 664c05b9ab2dd92aad807bd7f9aa273955949abe > > Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> > > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 17 22:02:55 2014 +0200 > > Commit: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> > > CommitDate: Wed Sep 10 18:52:45 2014 +0200 > > > > nohz: Consolidate nohz full init code > > > > The supports for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=y and the nohz_full= kernel > > parameter both have their own way to do the same thing: allocate > > full dynticks cpumasks, fill them and initialize some state variables. > > > > Lets consolidate that all in the same place. > > > > While at it, convert some regular printk message to warnings when > > fundamental allocations fail. > > > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> > > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> > > > > +-----------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+ > > | | ed1fb75de3 | 664c05b9ab | dd99eb9cdf | > > +-----------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+ > > | boot_successes | 60 | 0 | 0 | > > | boot_failures | 0 | 20 | 23 | > > So you tested ed1fb75de3 and 664c05b9ab with the same config that is in attachement, right? Yes. > I can't find what dd99eb9cdf refers to though. It's an internal merge-and-test branch head. > One more thing below: > > > | WARNING:at_arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:warn_pre_alternatives() | 0 | 20 | 22 | > > | BUG:kernel_boot_hang | 0 | 20 | 22 | > > | backtrace:setup_default_timer_irq | 0 | 20 | 22 | > > | backtrace:hpet_time_init | 0 | 20 | 22 | > > | backtrace:x86_late_time_init | 0 | 20 | 22 | > > | WARNING:CPU:PID:at/kbuild/ | 0 | 1 | | > > | WARNING:CPU:PID:at_arch/x86/k | 0 | 1 | | > > | WARNING:CPU:PID:at_arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:warn_pre_al | 0 | 0 | 1 | > > | BUG:kernel_boot_crashed | 0 | 0 | 1 | > > +-----------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+------------+ > > > > [ 0.000000] ---------------------------------------------------- > > [ 0.000000] hpet clockevent registered > > [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1430 warn_pre_alternatives+0x1e/0x20() > > [ 0.000000] You're using static_cpu_has before alternatives have run! > > [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: > > [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.17.0-rc3-00007-g664c05b #840 > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000009 ffff880012603d80 ffffffff89dfe8c6 ffff880012603dc8 > > [ 0.000000] ffff880012603db8 ffffffff89a81df3 ffffffff8a414580 0000000000000000 > > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff880012603e18 > > [ 0.000000] Call Trace: > > [ 0.000000] <IRQ> [<ffffffff89dfe8c6>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89a81df3>] warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0x90 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89a81e57>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89acaadf>] ? rcu_check_callbacks+0x30f/0x7c0 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89a1396e>] warn_pre_alternatives+0x1e/0x20 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89aeddd5>] irq_work_tick+0x15/0x50 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89acfae6>] update_process_times+0x56/0x70 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89adae2b>] tick_periodic+0x2b/0xc0 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89adb0d1>] ? tick_handle_periodic+0x21/0x60 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89adb0d1>] tick_handle_periodic+0x21/0x60 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89a05500>] timer_interrupt+0x10/0x20 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89ac1ef4>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x64/0x110 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89ac1fd8>] handle_irq_event+0x38/0x60 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89ac4c24>] handle_level_irq+0x74/0x110 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89a04cf8>] handle_irq+0x58/0x150 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89aa8e89>] ? vtime_account_idle+0x9/0x50 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89aa8f0d>] ? vtime_common_account_irq_enter+0x3d/0x50 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89a04598>] do_IRQ+0x48/0xe0 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89e063ed>] common_interrupt+0x6d/0x6d > > [ 0.000000] <EOI> [<ffffffff89a2f0a6>] ? native_restore_fl+0x6/0x10 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89e04ea1>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x31/0x40 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89ac3845>] __setup_irq+0x255/0x580 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff89ac3bac>] setup_irq+0x3c/0xa0 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a529998>] ? hpet_enable+0x29a/0x2cb > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a51cb9b>] setup_default_timer_irq+0x1e/0x20 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a51cbb4>] hpet_time_init+0x17/0x19 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a51cb76>] x86_late_time_init+0xa/0x11 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a51ad8c>] start_kernel+0x383/0x3f8 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a51a120>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120 > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a51a432>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8a51a50b>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xd7/0xe4 > > So the issue here seems to be that something enabled irqs on boot way too early. > But I tried hard to reproduce that crash without success. So I wanted to ask you, > do you mind if I send you a patch to debug this? Never mind. Feel free to send me the patch. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists