Message-ID: <54121C1C.8080408@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:03:08 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: mmc: freeing host while host->detect work queue is still active

Running Fedora rawhides's 3.17.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc22.armv7hl kernel on 
Jetson TK1 (an ARM board containing Tegra SoC), I see the following 
during boot most times the Tegra SDHCI driver defers probe for the SD slot:

> [    8.377719] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: Got CD GPIO #170.
> [    8.377780] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: Got WP GPIO #132.
> [    8.377898] mmc1: Unknown controller version (3). You may experience problems.
> [    8.379796] sdhci-tegra 700b0400.sdhci: No vmmc regulator found
> [    8.380225] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    8.380243] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6 at lib/debugobjects.c:263 debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb4()
> [    8.380261] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x18
> [    8.380308] Modules linked in: ehci_tegra(+) sdhci_tegra sdhci_pltfm sdhci phy_tegra_usb mmc_core i2c_tegra tegra_drm drm_kms_helper drm host1x
> [    8.380319] CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 3.17.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc22.armv7hl #1
> [    8.380336] Workqueue: deferwq deferred_probe_work_func
> [    8.380358] [<c0218ffc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0212bf0>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
> [    8.380374] [<c0212bf0>] (show_stack) from [<c094dbe0>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xb0)
> [    8.380395] [<c094dbe0>] (dump_stack) from [<c0251690>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0x94)
> [    8.380413] [<c0251690>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c02516e8>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x34/0x44)
> [    8.380426] [<c02516e8>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c057ec6c>] (debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb4)
> [    8.380439] [<c057ec6c>] (debug_print_object) from [<c057f8d8>] (debug_check_no_obj_freed+0xf4/0x1dc)
> [    8.380453] [<c057f8d8>] (debug_check_no_obj_freed) from [<c0398174>] (kfree+0x160/0x308)
> [    8.380465] [<c0398174>] (kfree) from [<c0658094>] (device_release+0x64/0x98)
> [    8.380479] [<c0658094>] (device_release) from [<c056a8a4>] (kobject_release+0x12c/0x19c)
> [    8.380498] [<c056a8a4>] (kobject_release) from [<bf2994b0>] (sdhci_tegra_probe+0x190/0x1bc [sdhci_tegra])
> [    8.380810] [<bf2994b0>] (sdhci_tegra_probe [sdhci_tegra]) from [<c065e024>] (platform_drv_probe+0x34/0x68)
> [    8.380825] [<c065e024>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c065c0bc>] (driver_probe_device+0x13c/0x33c)
> [    8.380838] [<c065c0bc>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c065a5f8>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0x9c)
> [    8.380852] [<c065a5f8>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c065bf08>] (device_attach+0x70/0x94)
> [    8.380865] [<c065bf08>] (device_attach) from [<c065b464>] (bus_probe_device+0x30/0xa4)
> [    8.380878] [<c065b464>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c065b954>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x88/0xb8)
> [    8.380894] [<c065b954>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c026b0e8>] (process_one_work+0x2a0/0x5f8)
> [    8.380908] [<c026b0e8>] (process_one_work) from [<c026c7e4>] (worker_thread+0x2d0/0x40c)
> [    8.380922] [<c026c7e4>] (worker_thread) from [<c027153c>] (kthread+0xd4/0xe8)
> [    8.380936] [<c027153c>] (kthread) from [<c020ecc8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
> [    8.380941] ---[ end trace b1f4b0fe632eb3a4 ]---

The problem is as follows:

The following sequence of calls requests the CD (Change Detect) IRQ for 
the SD slot:

sdhci_tegra_probe()
sdhci_tegra_parse_dt()
mmc_of_parse()
mmc_gpio_request_cd()
devm_request_threaded_irq()

The IRQ is triggered by a pin on the SD slot, so could be in any state, 
and might fire immediately. This causes the IRQ handler 
mmc_gpio_cd_irqt() to run, which calls mmc_detect_change() which calls 
mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, ...); Thus, the work queue can 
be immediately active.

However, if later part of sdhci_tegra_probe() fails, e.g. 
sdhci_add_host() -> mmc_regulator_get_supply() -> 
devm_regulator_get_optional() -> -EPROBE_DEFER, then sdhci_tegra_probe() 
needs to tear everything down, and so calls sdhci_pltfm_free() -> 
sdhci_free_host() -> mmc_free_host() -> put_device(&host->class_dev) -> 
mmc_host_classdev_release() -> kfree(host). However, host->detect is 
part of host and may still be active at this point, which is what 
triggers the ODETECT log spew mentioned above.

This doesn't happen in linux-next, because mmc_gpiod_request_cd() 
doesn't set up the IRQ handler. Rather this happens inside 
mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq() which is called from mmc_start_host(), which 
I believe is well after deferred probe could occur.

Some possible options for fixing this in 3.17 are:

a) Back-port whatever changes in mainline stopped mmc_of_parse()() from 
requesting the IRQ. That is commit 740a221ef0e5 "mmc: slot-gpio: Add 
GPIO descriptor based CD GPIO API". I haven't investigated how many 
other commits would be required for that commit to apply, but I'm 
nervous it'd be too many to apply to 3.17.

b) Fix the -EPROBE_DEFER cleanup path to explicitly free the IRQ (so it 
can't schedule the work queue any more), and then cancel the work queue 
(so it isn't active and doesn't trigger the ODETECT message).

A naive patch might be like:

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
index 31969436d77c..8125f916be4a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
@@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ void mmc_free_host(struct mmc_host *host)
  	idr_remove(&mmc_host_idr, host->index);
  	spin_unlock(&mmc_host_lock);

+	mmc_gpiod_free_cd(host);
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
+
  	put_device(&host->class_dev);
  }

However, that's problematic, since I think mmc_free_host() would have to 
somehow determine whether it needs to call mmc_gpio_free_cd() or 
mmc_gpiod_free_cd()? Perhaps we should *just* call devm_free_irq() 
there, rather than tearing down all the GPIO stuff too, i.e. split out a 
separate mmc_gpio_free_cd_irq() function rather like there's a separate 
IRQ request function?

What approach do people prefer and/or does anyone have any other ideas 
for a fix?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists