linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound violation information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5412230A.6090805@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:32:42 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound
 violation information

On 09/11/2014 03:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>> This patch sets bound violation fields of siginfo struct in #BR
>> exception handler by decoding the user instruction and constructing
>> the faulting pointer.
>>
>> This patch does't use the generic decoder, and implements a limited
>> special-purpose decoder to decode MPX instructions, simply because the
>> generic decoder is very heavyweight not just in terms of performance
>> but in terms of interface -- because it has to.
> 
> And why is that an argument to add another special purpose decoder?

Peter asked for it to be done this way specifically:

	https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/19/411

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/