linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH] signal: replace !likely with unlikely!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:48:16 +0800
From:	roy.qing.li@...il.com
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	fabf@...net.be, jkosina@...e.cz, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	richard@....at, oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] signal: replace !likely with unlikely!

From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com> 

!likely() is hard to be understood, and I do not know if compiler can
optimise this condition, but unlikely(!()) is clear

Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
---
 kernel/signal.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 8f0876f..6156cfa 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, int group)
 	BUG_ON(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC));
 
 	ret = -1;
-	if (!likely(lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
+	if (unlikely(!lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
 		goto ret;
 
 	ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/