linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] perf tools: parse the pmu event prefix and surfix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:46:59 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	kan.liang@...el.com
Cc:	acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] perf tools: parse the pmu event prefix and surfix

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:55:31PM -0400, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> 

SNIP

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +comp_pmu(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> +{
> +	struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *pmu1 =
> +			(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *) p1;
> +	struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *pmu2 =
> +			(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *) p2;
> +
> +	return strcmp(pmu1->symbol, pmu2->symbol);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Read the pmu events list from sysfs
> + * Save it into perf_pmu_events_list
> + */
> +static void perf_pmu__parse_init(void)
> +{
> +
> +	struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> +	struct perf_pmu_alias *alias;
> +	int len = 0;
> +

missing my previous comment being addressed:

---
Why do we need to call scan here? Looks like:
  pmu = pmu_lookup("cpu")

should be enough.. and could be used below as well
---

or commented why not to do it..

jirka

> +	while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL)
> +		list_for_each_entry(alias, &pmu->aliases, list) {
> +			if (!strcmp(pmu->name, "cpu")) {
> +				if (strchr(alias->name, '-'))
> +					len++;
> +				len++;
> +			}
> +	}
> +	if (len == 0)
> +		return;
> +	perf_pmu_events_list =
> +		malloc(sizeof(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol) * len);
> +	perf_pmu_events_list_num = len;
> +
> +	pmu = NULL;
> +	len = 0;
> +	while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL)
> +		list_for_each_entry(alias, &pmu->aliases, list) {
> +			if (!strcmp(pmu->name, "cpu")) {
> +				struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *p =
> +					perf_pmu_events_list + len;
> +				char *tmp = strchr(alias->name, '-');
> +
> +				if (tmp != NULL) {
> +					p->symbol =
> +						malloc(tmp - alias->name + 1);
> +					strlcpy(p->symbol, alias->name,
> +						tmp - alias->name + 1);
> +					p->type = KERNEL_PMU_EVENT_PREFIX;
> +					tmp++;
> +					p++;
> +					p->symbol = malloc(strlen(tmp) + 1);
> +					strcpy(p->symbol, tmp);
> +					p->type = KERNEL_PMU_EVENT_SUFFIX;
> +					len += 2;
> +				} else {
> +					p->symbol =
> +						malloc(strlen(alias->name) + 1);
> +					strcpy(p->symbol, alias->name);
> +					p->type = KERNEL_PMU_EVENT;
> +					len++;
> +				}
> +			}
> +		}
> +	qsort(perf_pmu_events_list, len,
> +		sizeof(struct perf_pmu_event_symbol), comp_pmu);
> +
> +}
> +

SNIP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/