[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911093942.GA12295@localhost>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:39:42 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] rtc: at91sam9: add DT support
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Johan, let me know if this version addresses part of your concerns.
Looks good to me. I just have a few minor comments on two of the patches.
> I'm open to any suggestion/rework to address other previously discussed
> issues, as long as it does not end up in a dead-end (like the discussion
> you had last year):
> - the fact that the RTT block could be used for something that is not
> an RTC
> - the fact that referencing the GPBR node and defining a GPBR register
> number to store RTC time info could be considered as an HW config and
> not an HW description and thus should not be described in the DT
No doubt.
> - other things I don't remember :-)
Thanks,
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists