lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911115519.52334db8@bbrezillon>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:55:19 +0200
From:	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] rtc: at91sam9: make use of syscon/regmap to
 access GPBR registers

On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:41:00 +0200
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:56:04AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > The GPBR registers are not part of the RTT block and thus should not be
> > defined in the reg property of the rtt node.
> > 
> > Use syscon to provide a proper DT representation and reference the GPBR
> > syscon device in a new "atmel,time-reg" property which store both the
> > syscon device phandle and the register offset within the GPBR block.
> > 
> > When using non DT boards, we won't be able to retrieve the syscon regmap,
> > hence we need to create our own regmap using the memory region defined
> > in the 2nd memory resource assigned to the RTT platform device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > 
> > Conflicts:
> > 	drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
> 
> You probably don't want this here.

Absolutely, it's a rebase leftover :-).
I'll remove this line from the commit message.

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/Kconfig        |  1 +
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> > index a168e96..7d76da8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> > @@ -1081,6 +1081,7 @@ config RTC_DRV_AT91RM9200
> >  config RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9
> >  	tristate "AT91SAM9x/AT91CAP9 RTT as RTC"
> >  	depends on ARCH_AT91 && !(ARCH_AT91RM9200 || ARCH_AT91X40)
> > +	select MFD_SYSCON
> >  	help
> >  	  RTC driver for the Atmel AT91SAM9x and AT91CAP9 internal RTT
> >  	  (Real Time Timer). These timers are powered by the backup power
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
> > index d72c34d..b953545 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * This driver uses two configurable hardware resources that live in the
> > @@ -72,7 +74,8 @@ struct sam9_rtc {
> >  	void __iomem		*rtt;
> >  	struct rtc_device	*rtcdev;
> >  	u32			imr;
> > -	void __iomem		*gpbr;
> > +	struct regmap		*gpbr;
> > +	unsigned int		gpbr_offset;
> >  	int 			irq;
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -81,10 +84,18 @@ struct sam9_rtc {
> >  #define rtt_writel(rtc, field, val) \
> >  	writel((val), (rtc)->rtt + AT91_RTT_ ## field)
> >  
> > -#define gpbr_readl(rtc) \
> > -	readl((rtc)->gpbr)
> > -#define gpbr_writel(rtc, val) \
> > -	writel((val), (rtc)->gpbr)
> > +static inline unsigned int gpbr_readl(struct sam9_rtc *rtc) {
> 
> Brace placement. Did you run checkpatch on the rest of the series?

Actually, I did last time I submitted, but forgot to run it this time.
Sorry, for the inconvenience, I'll fix that.

Best Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ