[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911100721.GT3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:07:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, riel@...hat.com,
Morten.Rasmussen@....com, efault@....de, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher
capacity
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:06:51PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 18db43e..60ae1ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6049,6 +6049,14 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
> return true;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * The group capacity is reduced probably because of activity from other
> + * sched class or interrupts which use part of the available capacity
> + */
> + if ((sg->sgc->capacity_orig * 100) > (sgs->group_capacity *
> + env->sd->imbalance_pct))
> + return true;
> +
> return false;
> }
This is unlikely to have worked as intended. You will never reach this,
except on PowerPC >= 7. All other machines will have bailed at the
!ASYM_PACKING check above this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists