[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410430345.22863.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:12:25 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Sanjeev Sharma <sanjeev_sharma@...tor.com>
Cc: dsd@...too.org, kune@...ne-taler.de,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zd1211rw: replace ZD_ASSERT with
lockdep_assert_held()
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 15:39 +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> on some architecture spin_is_locked() always return false in
> uniprocessor configuration and therefore it would be advise
> to replace with lockdep_assert_held().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <Sanjeev_Sharma@...tor.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - corrected the typo
Now it compiles, but you got the logic wrong.
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void zd_mac_clear(struct zd_mac *mac)
> {
> flush_workqueue(zd_workqueue);
> zd_chip_clear(&mac->chip);
> - ZD_ASSERT(!spin_is_locked(&mac->lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&mac->lock);
> ZD_MEMCLEAR(mac, sizeof(struct zd_mac));
> }
Look closely at this again.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists