linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT for SMP initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:24:36 +0100
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT for SMP
 initialization

On Mon,  1 Sep 2014 22:57:47 +0800, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> MADT contains the information for MPIDR which is essential for
> SMP initialization, parse the GIC cpu interface structures to
> get the MPIDR value and map it to cpu_logical_map(), and add
> enabled cpu with valid MPIDR into cpu_possible_map.
> 
> ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to boot up SMP, PSCI and
> Parking protocol, but the Parking protocol is only specified for
> ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only way for the SMP boot protocol
> before some updates for the ACPI spec or the Parking protocol spec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
> ---
> +/**
> + * acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface - generates a logical cpu number
> + * and map to MPIDR represented by GICC structure
> + * @mpidr: CPU's hardware id to register, MPIDR represented in MADT
> + * @enabled: this cpu is enabled or not
> + *
> + * Returns the logical cpu number which maps to MPIDR
> + */
> +static int acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface(u64 mpidr, u8 enabled)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (mpidr == INVALID_HWID) {
> +		pr_info("Skip invalid cpu hardware ID\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	total_cpus++;
> +	if (!enabled)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (enabled_cpus >=  NR_CPUS) {
> +		pr_warn("NR_CPUS limit of %d reached, Processor %d/0x%llx ignored.\n",
> +			NR_CPUS, total_cpus, mpidr);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* No need to check duplicate MPIDRs for the first CPU */
> +	if (enabled_cpus) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Duplicate MPIDRs are a recipe for disaster. Scan
> +		 * all initialized entries and check for
> +		 * duplicates. If any is found just ignore the CPU.
> +		 */
> +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +			if (cpu_logical_map(cpu) == mpidr) {
> +				pr_err("Firmware bug, duplicate CPU MPIDR: 0x%llx in MADT\n",
> +				mpidr);
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/* Fist GICC entry must be BSP as ACPI spec said */
> +		if  (cpu_logical_map(0) != mpidr) {
> +			pr_err("First GICC entry is not BSP for MPIDR 0x%llx\n",
> +			       mpidr);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* allocate a logical cpu id for the new comer */
> +	if (cpu_logical_map(0) == mpidr) {
> +		/*
> +		 * boot_cpu_init() already hold bit 0 in cpu_present_mask
> +		 * for BSP, no need to allocate again.
> +		 */
> +		cpu = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		cpu = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_possible_mask);
> +	}

Nit: so the above two if/else blocks are essentially testing for the
same condition: Is this the first cpu? or a secondary cpu? I would
merge the two into a single if/else block.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/