[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911113051.GG25317@minantech.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:30:51 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, jan.kiszka@....de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] kvm, mem-hotplug: Reload L1' apic access page on
migration in vcpu_enter_guest().
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:47:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 11/09/2014 12:12, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:21:49AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 11/09/2014 07:38, Tang Chen ha scritto:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >>> index 63c4c3e..da6d55d 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> >>> @@ -7093,6 +7093,11 @@ static void vmx_set_virtual_x2apic_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool set)
> >>> vmx_set_msr_bitmap(vcpu);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static void vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t hpa)
> >>> +{
> >>> + vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR, hpa);
> >>
> >> This has to be guarded by "if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))".
> >>
> > We do need to write it if L1 and L2 share APIC_ACCESS_ADDR and skip
> > it otherwise, no?
>
> Yes, but this would be handled by patch 6:
>
> } else if (vm_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(vmx->vcpu.kvm)) {
> + struct page *page = gfn_to_page(vmx->vcpu.kvm,
> + APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> exec_control |=
> SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
> - vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
> - page_to_phys(vcpu->kvm->arch.apic_access_page));
> + vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR, page_to_phys(page));
> + /*
> + * Do not pin apic access page in memory so that memory
> + * hotplug process is able to migrate it.
> + */
> + put_page(page);
> }
This code is in prepare_vmcs02() and is executed during L1->L2 vmentry. What happens
when apic access page is migrated while L2 is running? It needs to be update somewhere.
>
> However, this is also useless code duplication because the above snippet could
> reuse vcpu_reload_apic_access_page too.
>
> So I think you cannot do the is_guest_mode check in
> kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page and also not in
> vmx_reload_apic_access_page. But you could do something like
>
> kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(...)
> {
> ...
> kvm_x86_ops->reload_apic_access_page(...);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page);
>
> /* used in vcpu_enter_guest only */
> vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(...)
> {
> if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))
> kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(...)
> }
>
> Paolo
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists