[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACE9dm-4tURS7ZvJ45W81L5d3yaO8VDyvrcn1-SU_6UsHkmuQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:27:05 +0300
From: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
keyrings <keyrings@...ux-nfs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KEYS: Reinstate EPERM for a key type name beginning
with a '.'
On 11 September 2014 15:09, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:36 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:22 +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> > > Reinstate the generation of EPERM for a key type name beginning with a
>> > > '.' in a userspace call. Types whose name begins with a '.' are
>> > > internal only.
>>
>> After re-reading your comment and looking at the different types,
>> testing for dot prefixed types now makes sense. Both dot prefixed types
>> and keyring names are reserved for the kernel.
>
> Are you withdrawing your objection, then?
>
For me, type test looks unrelated to "." prefixed key/keyring names...
The rest of that patch does following:
+ } else if ((description[0] == '.') &&
+ (strncmp(type, "keyring", 7) == 0)) {
+ ret = -EPERM;
+ goto error2;
I wonder why this test is only disallowing keyrings...
Why not also keys?
keyctl add user ".ring1" Hello @u
keyctl show
50463278 --alswrv 0 0 \_ user: .ring1
- Dmitry
> David
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists