lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1410438733.517098496@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:32:13 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 034/131] ext4: fix ext4_discard_allocated_blocks() if
 we can't allocate the pa struct

3.2.63-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

commit 86f0afd463215fc3e58020493482faa4ac3a4d69 upstream.

If there is a failure while allocating the preallocation structure, a
number of blocks can end up getting marked in the in-memory buddy
bitmap, and then not getting released.  This can result in the
following corruption getting reported by the kernel:

EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:758: group 1126,
12793 clusters in bitmap, 12729 in gd

In that case, we need to release the blocks using mb_free_blocks().

Tested: fs smoke test; also demonstrated that with injected errors,
	the file system is no longer getting corrupted

Google-Bug-Id: 16657874

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3128,8 +3128,27 @@ static void ext4_mb_collect_stats(struct
 static void ext4_discard_allocated_blocks(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
 {
 	struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa = ac->ac_pa;
+	struct ext4_buddy e4b;
+	int err;
 
-	if (pa && pa->pa_type == MB_INODE_PA)
+	if (pa == NULL) {
+		err = ext4_mb_load_buddy(ac->ac_sb, ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group, &e4b);
+		if (err) {
+			/*
+			 * This should never happen since we pin the
+			 * pages in the ext4_allocation_context so
+			 * ext4_mb_load_buddy() should never fail.
+			 */
+			WARN(1, "mb_load_buddy failed (%d)", err);
+			return;
+		}
+		ext4_lock_group(ac->ac_sb, ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group);
+		mb_free_blocks(ac->ac_inode, &e4b, ac->ac_f_ex.fe_start,
+			       ac->ac_f_ex.fe_len);
+		ext4_unlock_group(ac->ac_sb, ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (pa->pa_type == MB_INODE_PA)
 		pa->pa_free += ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len;
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ