lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1410438733.803181458@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:32:13 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 051/131] drm/ttm: Fix possible stack overflow by
 recursive shrinker calls.

3.2.63-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>

commit 71336e011d1d2312bcbcaa8fcec7365024f3a95d upstream.

While ttm_dma_pool_shrink_scan() tries to take mutex before doing GFP_KERNEL
allocation, ttm_pool_shrink_scan() does not do it. This can result in stack
overflow if kmalloc() in ttm_page_pool_free() triggered recursion due to
memory pressure.

  shrink_slab()
  => ttm_pool_shrink_scan()
     => ttm_page_pool_free()
        => kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
           => shrink_slab()
              => ttm_pool_shrink_scan()
                 => ttm_page_pool_free()
                    => kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)

Change ttm_pool_shrink_scan() to do like ttm_dma_pool_shrink_scan() does.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Adjust context
 - Change return value in the contended case to follow the old shrinker
   API]   
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c
@@ -398,13 +398,18 @@ static int ttm_pool_get_num_unused_pages
 static int ttm_pool_mm_shrink(struct shrinker *shrink,
 			      struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	static atomic_t start_pool = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+	static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
+	static unsigned start_pool;
 	unsigned i;
-	unsigned pool_offset = atomic_add_return(1, &start_pool);
+	unsigned pool_offset;
 	struct ttm_page_pool *pool;
 	int shrink_pages = sc->nr_to_scan;
 
-	pool_offset = pool_offset % NUM_POOLS;
+	if (shrink_pages == 0)
+		goto out;
+	if (!mutex_trylock(&lock))
+		return -1;
+	pool_offset = ++start_pool % NUM_POOLS;
 	/* select start pool in round robin fashion */
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_POOLS; ++i) {
 		unsigned nr_free = shrink_pages;
@@ -413,6 +418,8 @@ static int ttm_pool_mm_shrink(struct shr
 		pool = &_manager->pools[(i + pool_offset)%NUM_POOLS];
 		shrink_pages = ttm_page_pool_free(pool, nr_free);
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&lock);
+out:
 	/* return estimated number of unused pages in pool */
 	return ttm_pool_get_num_unused_pages();
 }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ