[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1410438733.602516901@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:32:13 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 064/131] powerpc/mm: Use read barrier when creating
real_pte
3.2.63-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 85c1fafd7262e68ad821ee1808686b1392b1167d upstream.
On ppc64 we support 4K hash pte with 64K page size. That requires
us to track the hash pte slot information on a per 4k basis. We do that
by storing the slot details in the second half of pte page. The pte bit
_PAGE_COMBO is used to indicate whether the second half need to be
looked while building real_pte. We need to use read memory barrier while
doing that so that load of hidx is not reordered w.r.t _PAGE_COMBO
check. On the store side we already do a lwsync in __hash_page_4K
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: include <asm/system.h> to ensure smp_rmb()
is defined; cell_defconfig fails to build without this]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-hash64-64k.h
@@ -40,17 +40,39 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <asm/system.h> /* for smp_rmb() */
+
/*
* With 64K pages on hash table, we have a special PTE format that
* uses a second "half" of the page table to encode sub-page information
* in order to deal with 64K made of 4K HW pages. Thus we override the
* generic accessors and iterators here
*/
-#define __real_pte(e,p) ((real_pte_t) { \
- (e), (pte_val(e) & _PAGE_COMBO) ? \
- (pte_val(*((p) + PTRS_PER_PTE))) : 0 })
-#define __rpte_to_hidx(r,index) ((pte_val((r).pte) & _PAGE_COMBO) ? \
- (((r).hidx >> ((index)<<2)) & 0xf) : ((pte_val((r).pte) >> 12) & 0xf))
+#define __real_pte __real_pte
+static inline real_pte_t __real_pte(pte_t pte, pte_t *ptep)
+{
+ real_pte_t rpte;
+
+ rpte.pte = pte;
+ rpte.hidx = 0;
+ if (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_COMBO) {
+ /*
+ * Make sure we order the hidx load against the _PAGE_COMBO
+ * check. The store side ordering is done in __hash_page_4K
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+ rpte.hidx = pte_val(*((ptep) + PTRS_PER_PTE));
+ }
+ return rpte;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __rpte_to_hidx(real_pte_t rpte, unsigned long index)
+{
+ if ((pte_val(rpte.pte) & _PAGE_COMBO))
+ return (rpte.hidx >> (index<<2)) & 0xf;
+ return (pte_val(rpte.pte) >> 12) & 0xf;
+}
+
#define __rpte_to_pte(r) ((r).pte)
#define __rpte_sub_valid(rpte, index) \
(pte_val(rpte.pte) & (_PAGE_HPTE_SUB0 >> (index)))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists