[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5411AC82.4080005@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:06:58 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
CC: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, jan.kiszka@....de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] kvm, mem-hotplug: Reload L1' apic access page
on migration in vcpu_enter_guest().
Il 11/09/2014 15:59, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>
> Suppose vmcs01->APIC_ACCESS_ADDR = 0xf000. During L2 entry
> vmcs02->APIC_ACCESS_ADDR is set to 0xf000 too (by prepare_vmcs02). Now
> 0xf000 is migrated to 0x8000, mmu notifier is called, it forces vmexit,
> but vcpu is in a guest mode so vmcs02->APIC_ACCESS_ADDR is never updated
> to 0x8000 because of "if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))" check. So what am I
> missing here?
Right, guest mode isn't left as soon as you execute nested_vmx_vmexit,
because this isn't an L2->L1 exit. So we need an "else" for that "if
(!is_guest_mode(vcpu))", in which case the hpa is ignored and
vmcs12->apic_access_addr is used instead?
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists