[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409111647000.4178@nanos>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:47:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 v1 07/18] x86, irq: Introduce helpers to access struct
irq_cfg
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > -static inline struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
> > +struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
> > {
> > return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> > }
> >
> > +struct irq_cfg *irqd_cfg(struct irq_data *irq_data)
> > +{
> > + return irq_data->chip_data;
> > +}
>
> We can make those inlines. There is no point to have that as global
> functions.
Never mind. Just reading the other patch set.....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists