[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911151835.GA28298@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:18:35 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:57:54PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
>
> Add Kconfigs to build ACPI on ARM64, and make ACPI available on ARM64.
>
> acpi_idle driver is x86/IA64 dependent now, so make CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR
> depend on X86 || IA64, and implement it on ARM64 in the future.
So are S states. Maybe I am being pedantic, but why can't you do
the same thing for drivers/acpi/sleep.c ? Is it really that complicated to add
a config option and avoid compiling it (that file supports a part
of the ACPI specs that is completely undefined for ARM64), and with that
removing the need for useless hooks on ARM64 ?
Why do we have to compile that code at all on ARM64 ?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 ++
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 065438c..8dabaeb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -422,6 +422,8 @@ source "drivers/Kconfig"
>
> source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"
>
> +source "drivers/acpi/Kconfig"
> +
> source "fs/Kconfig"
>
> source "arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index d0f3265..f935d2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -5,8 +5,7 @@
> menuconfig ACPI
> bool "ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support"
> depends on !IA64_HP_SIM
> - depends on IA64 || X86
> - depends on PCI
> + depends on ((IA64 || X86) && PCI) || (ARM64 && EXPERT)
> select PNP
> default y
> help
> @@ -163,6 +162,7 @@ config ACPI_PROCESSOR
> tristate "Processor"
> select THERMAL
> select CPU_IDLE
> + depends on X86 || IA64
> default y
> help
> This driver installs ACPI as the idle handler for Linux and uses
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG
>
> config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> bool "PCI slot detection driver"
> - depends on SYSFS
> + depends on SYSFS && PCI
> default n
> help
> This driver creates entries in /sys/bus/pci/slots/ for all PCI
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists