linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tools lib fd array: Do not set fd as non blocking evlist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140911152726.GJ10158@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:27:26 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools lib fd array: Do not set fd as non blocking evlist

Em Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:09:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:08:46AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +void fdarray__exit(struct fdarray *fda)
> > +{
> > +	free(fda->entries);
> > +	fdarray__init(fda, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void fdarray__delete(struct fdarray *fda)
> > +{
> > +	fdarray__exit(fda);
> > +	free(fda);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int fdarray__add(struct fdarray *fda, int fd, short revents)
> > +{
> > +	if (fda->nr == fda->nr_alloc &&
> > +	    fdarray__grow(fda, fda->nr_autogrow) < 0)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
> 
> also I spot this one and couldn't think of reason for it, attached
> patch makes no behaviour difference for me..

Have to look why it is there, perhaps there is some changeset
specifically made for this, will do some research...
 
> I might be missing something, but I dont see any blocking operation
> in perf related data reads. The git log history says it was there
> since early days.

Oops, you did that research already, have you followed the history all
the way to when this code lived in Documentation/ ?

But yes, I agree with your comment that this is something up to the
users to do, not for a general purpose class as fdarray is set out to
be.

I think the way to do this is to not move this fcntl when introducing
the fdarray class, but instead leave it at the perf_evlist__add_pollfd()
function, then, in a later patch, if we determine that it is not needed
at all, nuke it, ok?

- Arnaldo
 
> jirka
> 
> 
> ---
> There's no reason for the current user of this API
> to have non blocking fds. Also it should be up to
> user to set this, not this object.
> 
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/lib/api/fd/array.c |    1 -
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> index 3f6d1a0..0e636c4 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ int fdarray__add(struct fdarray *fda, int fd, short revents)
>  	    fdarray__grow(fda, fda->nr_autogrow) < 0)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
>  	fda->entries[fda->nr].fd     = fd;
>  	fda->entries[fda->nr].events = revents;
>  	fda->nr++;
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/