[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911155324.GA27076@developer>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:53:27 -0400
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
dtor <dtor@...omium.org>, Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
"addy.ke@...k-chips.com" <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
zhaoyifeng <zyf@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: document Rockchip thermal
Arnd,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:32:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 11 September 2014 08:18:43 Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > > As what we want is to make thermal driver have a chance to configure the
> > > hardware shutdown registers, I'm thinking if we can do this without
> > > representing the hardware shutdown value as a trip point.
> > > Say,
> > > 1. parse DT, and get the hardware shutdown temperature value, and store
> > > it somewhere, e.g. struct __thermal_zone.
> > > 2. introduce a new parameter, int (*set_hardware_trip)(void *, long *),
> > > in thermal_zone_of_sensor_register().
> > > 3. invoke set_hard_trip(tz, hardware_shutdown_temperature_value) in
> > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register().
> >
> > The only issue I have with the above proposal is that not all platforms
> > use DT. Some still boot with boardfiles, for instance. Thus, the
> > parameter to configure hardware thermal shutdown needs to be common on
> > thermal core, not specific to of-thermal. Do you agree?
>
> Do you know of a machine that can't yet be converted to DT and that
> needs this driver? In case of rockchips that is certainly not the
> case, and we don't care about anybody trying to use board files out
> of tree, they can just hack the thermal support as well.
I see. Again, the only concern I have is to produce thermal framework APIs
that would be only in the of-thermal. My point is not specific to this
patch, or this platform, but with a detail in the above proposal.
While I agree to have a trip specific to configurable hardware triggered
thermal shutdown, I just don't see why it needs to be a feature
implemented only via of-thermal. It has to be properly defined in
thermal core.
The proposal of of-thermal is not to become a separate/competing thermal
framework.
>
> Arnd
Cheers,
Eduardo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists