linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] OMAP Mailbox framework adoption & DT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140911170955.GA18849@atomide.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:09:55 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc:	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
	Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
	Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...aro.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] OMAP Mailbox framework adoption & DT support

* Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> [140909 09:16]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 09/08/2014 09:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [140908 16:21]:
> >> * Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> [140729 17:37]:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> This is an updated version of the OMAP Mailbox framework adoption &
> >>> DT support series, refreshed to work with the v9 version of the mailbox
> >>> framework [1] from Jassi Brar while also addressing some minor review
> >>> comments. Detailed changes are summarized below. Patches are based on
> >>> 3.16-rc2.
> >>
> >> Sorry for the delay, just noticed that I'm supposed to queue
> >> these too. I'll queue these into omap-for-v3.18/mailbox against
> >> v3.17-rc1 and will probably also merge it into omap-for-v3.18/dt
> >> as well.
> > 
> > Actually this is not compiling and seems to probably miss
> > the dependencies from Jassi, so dropping the branch.
> 
> The last 2 patches which is the framework adoption portion needs the
> framework patches from Jassi (as stated in the cover letter). I will
> ping on the framework thread to see if it is making it into 3.18. In any
> case, we should be able to take the first three patches (2 in drivers
> and 1 for DT) - they are independent of the framework and also are
> dependencies for the framework adoption patches.
> 
> > Anyways, since it seems you need to repost this again, please
> > repost the DT changes separately from the driver changes.
> 
> Yeah, the other two dependent series are merged for 3.17, so these are
> the only patches remaining. I just need to repost them on a 3.17-rc, but
> there are no changes required (even with v10 of the framework). So given
> above, do you want me to split the first 3 (there is one DT patch) and
> post them so that they can be merged for 3.18?

Yes please and looks like you already did thanks :)

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/