[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuyTfRwZi1-yOyrAOkubWLDLC6YZXUq8OFpqXpHPjKRYhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:35:31 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 net-next 00/12] eBPF syscall, verifier, testsuite
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 09/10/2014 10:21 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> ...
>>>>
>>>> char bpf_log_buf[LOG_BUF_SIZE];
>>>
>>>
>>> What happens if the size isn't LOG_BUF_SIZE?
>>
>>
>> would do you mean?
>> LOG_BUF_SIZE is just a user defined macro.
>> Can be anything.
>
> I believe, Andy means, what would happen if log_level > 0 but
> the log_size is not big enough so that the human-readable error
> text string from the verifier will fit into it? I presume that
> will be truncated then ... hm.
Correct. It will be truncated and ENOSPC returned from syscall.
Just noticed that I didn't mention that in the manpage... will do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists