[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAYfjp6cShrXCq2p24L5gvwxkDLZtzxiSaFQCo=iMjxbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:41:01 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] sched: get CPU's utilization statistic
On 11 September 2014 21:17, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Any other opinions before Vince goes and applies sed on patches? ;-)
>
> I don't mind either way, but for sure someone (possibly me) is going to
> confuse the two soon enough.
>
> Please include in the code some formal definition in the context of the
> scheduler. A comment block right before the corresponding get_cpu_*
> accessors should be good enough.
ok
>
>
> Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists