[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5412BFAF.7050900@lsexperts.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:41:03 +0200
From: Eric Sesterhenn <eric.sesterhenn@...xperts.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Conrad Kostecki <ck@...rad-kostecki.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501
hi,
On 09/09/2014 05:26 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 07:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> @hpa: You asked whether this might affect any other e6xx devices.
>>
>> According to the atom e6xx-series datasheet the HPET is non optional
>> and always memory mapped to 0xfed00000. I don't see how that would
>> harm any machine which has the hpet proper advertised via ACPI.
>>
>
> That seems straightforward then.
this means the original patch written by Conrad is going to be applied?
Is there anything we can do to help regarding this issue?
> I still wish someone would take a cluebat to Soekris. We keep hearing
> crap like this about their firmware over and over and over again. It
> isn't like you can't get EDK2 or Coreboot and build a BIOS based mostly
> on Open Source components these days... oh, wait.
I have send them another message regarding this issue, but so far
they did not respond. In the past their responsiveness also varied a lot
according to my collegue.
Regards, Eric
--
LSE Leading Security Experts GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt
Unternehmenssitz: Weiterstadt, Amtsgericht Darmstadt: HRB8649
Geschäftsführer: Oliver Michel, Sven Walther
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4011 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists