[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1410527535-9814-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:12:14 -0400
From: riel@...hat.com
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, prarit@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com, sgruszka@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH -tip 1/2] seqlock: add irqsave variant of read_seqbegin_or_lock
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
There are cases where read_seqbegin_or_lock needs to block irqs,
because the seqlock in question nests inside a lock that is also
be taken from irq context.
Add read_seqbegin_or_lock_irqsave and done_seqretry_irqrestore, which
are almost identical to read_seqbegin_or_lock and done_seqretry.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/seqlock.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index cc35963..4364cd3 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -456,4 +456,21 @@ read_sequnlock_excl_irqrestore(seqlock_t *sl, unsigned long flags)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sl->lock, flags);
}
+static inline unsigned long read_seqbegin_or_lock_irqsave(seqlock_t *lock,
+ int *seq)
+{
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
+ if (!(*seq & 1)) /* Even */
+ *seq = read_seqbegin(lock);
+ else /* Odd */
+ read_seqlock_excl_irqsave(lock, flags);
+ return flags;
+}
+
+static inline void done_seqretry_irqrestore(seqlock_t *lock, int seq,
+ unsigned long flags)
+{
+ if (seq & 1)
+ read_sequnlock_excl_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+}
#endif /* __LINUX_SEQLOCK_H */
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists