[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410533379.2166.14.camel@linux-t7sj.site>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:49:39 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] locktorture: Support rwsems
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 09:37 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:41:30PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > We can easily do so with our new reader lock support. Just an arbitrary
> > design default: readers have higher (5x) critical region latencies than
> > writers: 50 ms and 10 ms, respectively.
> >
>
> Nice, could you copy/paste this into a rwlock test as well?
Indeed, if folks like what the see in this patchset then adding more
locks is pretty trivial.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists