[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E0BE1322F2F2246BD820DA9FC397ADE017A4015@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 03:02:38 +0000
From: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 09/10] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables
On 2014-09-11, Hansen, Dave wrote:
> On 09/11/2014 01:46 AM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>> + * This function will be called by do_munmap(), and the VMAs
>> + covering
>> + * the virtual address region start...end have already been split
>> + if
>> + * necessary and remvoed from the VMA list.
>
> "remvoed" -> "removed"
>
>> +void mpx_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end) {
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = mpx_try_unmap(mm, start, end);
>> + if (ret == -EINVAL)
>> + force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
>> +}
>
> In the case of a fault during an unmap, this just ignores the
> situation and returns silently. Where is the code to retry the
> freeing operation outside of mmap_sem?
Dave, you mean delayed_work code? According to our discussion, it will be deferred to another mainline post.
Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists