[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5413150B.9010803@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:45:15 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] block: introduce blk_init_flush and its pair
On 2014-09-12 09:41, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>> On 2014-09-12 08:47, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>
>>> These two functions are introduced to initialize and de-initialize
>>> flush stuff centrally.
>>
>>
>> I know you said these change later to more proper naming, but that only
>> happens further down. Lets get rid of these wrappers and just call
>> blk_alloc_flush_queue() directly.
>
> It is too early to call blk_alloc_flush_queue() because flush queue doesn't
> come until patch 5 appears, :-) And I think it is cleaner to put
> flush initialization
> stuff together first, then introduce flush_queue.
Then do it later. Fact is, final result still looks like this in
blk_mq_init_queue():
if (blk_init_flush(q))
...
where it would be cleaner as just assigning q->fq. My previous (and
existing) point is that you have no idea what this init_flush() function
does without jumping in and reading it.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists