[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140912154903.GE5532@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:49:03 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: "hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce sleep-arm.c
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 04:18:51PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:51:02PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> > > @@ -23,7 +23,11 @@ acpi-y += nvs.o
> > >
> > > # Power management related files
> > > acpi-y += wakeup.o
> > > +ifeq ($(ARCH), arm64)
> > > +acpi-y += sleep-arm.o
> > > +else # X86, IA64
> > > acpi-y += sleep.o
> > > +endif
> > > acpi-y += device_pm.o
> > > acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += proc.o
> >
> > What about:
> >
> > -acpi-y += sleep.o
> > +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += sleep.o
> >
> > and make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP depend on !ARM64? Does the kernel compile if
> > you disable CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP?
>
> sleep.c is still needed in the case CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n
>
> basically the two functions I stubbed are always called by bus.c
So the two functions are:
acpi_target_system_state() - already defined in acpi_bus.h when
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is off.
acpi_sleep_init() - this one doesn't have a dummy implementation for
!ACPI_SLEEP.
Now, for x86, do we need acpi_sleep_init() when CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is
off? If not, we could simply add a dummy acpi_sleep_init() function when
!ACPI_SLEEP and don't enable the config option for arm64.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists