[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1409121413540.21514@gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:19:57 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>,
Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>, Su Tao <tao.su@...el.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bobby.prani@...il.com,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [rcu] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
000000da
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So, I am not seeing this failure in my testing, but my best guess is
> that the problem is due to the fact that force_quiescent_state() is
> sometimes invoked with preemption enabled, which breaks __this_cpu_read()
> though perhaps with very low probability. The common-case call (from
> __call_rcu_core()) -does- have preemption disabled, in fact, it has
> interrupts disabled.
How could __this_cpu_read() break in a way that would make a difference to
the code? There was no disabling/enabling of preemption before the patch
and there is nothing like that after the patch. If there was a race then
it still exists. The modification certainly cannot create a race.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists